Kazakhstan at the bottom of Freedom House rating
Freedom House has published its new Nations in Transit report. It is a several indicies-based analysis and rating of the countries, which were supposed to move from authoritarianism to democracy. However, many of the post-Soviet countries have obviously stopped in their movement, or even started active rollback to the “old good” methods of Soviet censorship, intolerance to the dissent and monoparty system. And it’s most of all applicable to the countries that are rich in hydrocarbons.
“National leaders in these countries appear not to understand that improving accountability will provide what citizens want - prosperity and rule of law - and would give states more options internationally,” says the report’s executive editor Jeannette Goehring - “They are taking advantage of high energy prices by building authoritarian regimes”.
Kazakhstan, as well as Russia, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan, has again deteriorated his position in the ranking - now it’s fourth from the bottom, unequivocally categorized as a “consolidated authoritarian regime”. Kazakhstan’s average democracy index has been consecutively falling since 1999 - from с 5.5 to 6.39. According to the FH methodology, 7 stands for the worst repressive state, and 1 testifies to the freest one. Only Belarus, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan appear to be worse than Kazakhstan.















on June 30th, 2007 at 12:04 pm
Just to be clear, and I know Adam was saying this, Kazakhstan is the fourth least free WITHIN the post-socialist nations. It is still significantly more free than say Zimbawe or North Korea.
Also, I don’t really see how Tajikistan is more free than Kazakhstan, though I admit I do not have any first hand knowledge of the latter. Freedom House rankings can be a little skewed, as they sometimes don’t take into account people’s actual ability to function in their society. So, while Kazakhstan may not be moving in the right direction with its politics, people are still increasing certain freedoms, like the ability to consume foreign media, or travel outside the country, because they are so much better off than citizens in truly impoverished nations. Like Tajikistan.
That being said, these results confirm a lot of what our writers seem to be observing on the ground here.